Raw Science
Independent analysis of the energy transition
Raw Science analyzes energy systems and critical materials from the perspectives of physics, chemistry, industrial infrastructure, supply chains, and system-level costs: the underpinning realities that determine what can realistically be implemented on a large scale. Founded by Dr. Giada Caniglia, an electrochemist with over ten years of experience, Raw Science is aimed at readers seeking a deeper and less conventional perspective on the transition.
What Raw Science is
The energy transition is fundamentally a matter of engineering, thermodynamics, and materials: engineering determines how to design, build, and integrate low‑carbon technologies; thermodynamics sets the physical limits and efficiencies of energy conversion, conversion losses, and storage; and materials science governs availability, lifetime, performance, and the scalability of devices such as batteries, photovoltaics, wind turbines, and power electronics.
But the energy transition is also driven by economics, supply chains (including mining and recycling policy), market design, regulation, finance, political choices, and social systems, any of which can enable or become the binding constraint on its deployment.
Most public commentary skips that complexity or reduces it to oversimplified narratives.
Raw Science exists to connect these layers and analyze the transition as the complex physical and industrial system it actually is.
The analytical lens
Each deep dive and every article in Raw Science is built on peer-reviewed literature, primary data, trade and customs records, regulatory filings, and national-laboratory studies, synthesized through a consistent analytical lens.
Every Raw Science piece is read through four-pillar framework that organizes (i) the physical systems behind the transition, (ii) the materials and supply chains that constrain them, (iii) the system-level costs and infrastructural inertia that compound them, and (iv) the way how the evidence travels (and get distorted) from a peer-reviewed paper to the public conversation.
Editorial principles
Independence
Raw Science is fully editorially independent and funded entirely by its readers. No advertisers, corporate sponsors, or institutional backers influencing its editorial direction.
Methodological transparency
Each deep dive analysis is based on verifiable sources, and clearly stated limitations. When conclusions depend on uncertain variables or controversial evidence, those uncertainties are highlighted rather than concealed.
Citation hygiene
References are integrated directly into the text, with DOIs used whenever possible. Data, figures, and numerical claims remain attached to their original sources rather than recycled through secondary commentary.
The author
Why Raw Science exists
Raw Science does not aim to persuade. It aims to put the right evidence, in the right context, with the right caveats, in front of readers who already know how to think… and let them do the rest.
If a subject is complex, we take it apart.
If it is contested, we put it in context.
And if it is fascinating, we explain it.